← Back to Regnor Knowledge Earlier sample · Peptide research

Peptide research, with every claim traced to its source.

An early sample we built from public academic papers, market reports and regulatory documents: 146 pages covering 50 peptide products, the companies and regulators behind them, and the markets they sell into. Every statement points back to the document it came from.

50productpages
39explainerpages
10organisationpages
7marketpages
23sourcesummaries
Walkthrough · Nº 01

How this sample was built.

A video tour of this sample, recorded when it was built: the sources it started from, how they were organised, and what came out.

Asking questions · Nº 02

Asking the sample questions.

A screen recording of questions being asked of this sample, with answers that cite the pages they came from. Today’s chat adds a second check on every answer and one click to the exact passage.

How it was built · Nº 03

From public sources to linked, checked pages.

We started from academic papers, market reports and regulatory notices, all of them public, and turned them into a set of linked pages a team could read and question. In plain terms, it took four steps.

01 - Gather the sources

We collected the public papers, market reports and regulatory notices on peptides, 23 sources in all.

02 - Read and organise

Each source was read once, carefully, and its facts were sorted into pages for each product, company, market and idea, so the same kind of page always answers the same kind of question.

03 - Link and compare

A peptide mentioned in a clinical paper, a market report and a regulator’s notice gets one page with all three sources side by side. Where sources disagree, the page says so.

04 - Check before saving

Every claim was checked against its source before it was kept. Claims about regulatory status had to come from the regulator itself, and anything resting on a single weak source was flagged instead of stated as fact.

How we kept it honest

In this build, the checks caught a clinical-trial statistic that was circulating in news coverage but could not be found in any primary source. It was kept out of the facts and marked as unverified.

The result: 146 pages: 50 products, 39 explanations of ideas and methods, 10 companies and regulators, 7 market overviews and 23 source summaries. This was the first build, and it took three months while the method was being worked out. Later samples took about a day each.

What has changed since · Nº 04

What the product does today.

This sample was built with an earlier version of our process. The same idea, every fact traced to its source, now runs as a complete product your team uses every day:

  • A private chat for your team, on desktop and phone, that answers only from your own documents.
  • Every page checked sentence by sentence against the original before anyone can use it. Anything that cannot be checked is held back and flagged.
  • Every answer cites its sources, and one click opens the exact passage. A second automatic check marks any point its source does not clearly support.
  • Each team sees only its own files, and changing anyone’s access needs an owner’s approval by email.
  • Set up on your own accounts, with documents added by upload or from Google Drive.

Our first live pilot, a wellness brand selling globally, now has 564 verified pages built from 50 of its documents, including the full set of regulations its products fall under. Watch the 20-second film to see it work.

Want this for your own documents?

Start with a paid trial on 50 of your own documents. Within one to two weeks you see real, cited answers from your own files, and we agree what a full build looks like.

Book a Discovery Call Back to Regnor Knowledge
Book a Discovery Call